Most people shopping for the best mixers for podcast recording start by reading spec sheets. That is the slowest possible way to pick one. Two questions decide almost everything: how many people are actually in the room with you, and do you want the mixer to record the session or just hand a clean mix to your computer?
Get those two answers and the list narrows fast. A solo host recording remote calls needs no mixer at all. A four-person roundtable needs four XLR inputs, four headphone outputs, and a device that can write each microphone to its own file. Buying a four-input console for a two-person show is the single most repeated regret we see in podcasting forums, and it is completely avoidable.
We spent six weeks with the twelve mixers below, moving between two-person interview setups, a four-seat panel, and a solo streaming desk. Each one gets a verdict, the technical detail that actually matters for podcast work, and an honest note on who should skip it. We also broke down how many inputs you need for a given headcount and where the sample-rate trade-offs bite. If you want a shorter path, our podcast mixer roundup covers the top tier in more depth.
What Is the Best Audio Mixer for Podcasts?
The Zoom PodTrak P4 is the best audio mixer for most podcasts: four XLR inputs, four independent headphone outputs, sound pads, automatic mix-minus for call-in guests, and standalone multitrack SD recording in a box you can carry. If you only ever record two people, the MAONO AME2 covers it for far less.
Top 3 Podcast Mixers for 2026
Zoom PodTrak P4
- 4 XLR inputs
- 4 independent headphone outs
- Automatic mix-minus
- Multitrack SD recording
Rode RODECaster Pro II
- 4 studio preamps
- APHEX voice processing
- 8 SMART pads
- Records standalone
MAONO G1 Neo
- XLR input with 48V phantom
- One-click noise reduction
- Voice effects and 4 pads
- Compact RGB desktop unit
Best Mixers for Podcast Recording at a Glance (October 2026)
| Product | Specifications | Action |
|---|---|---|
|
Check Latest Price | |
|
Check Latest Price | |
|
Check Latest Price | |
|
Check Latest Price | |
|
Check Latest Price | |
|
Check Latest Price | |
|
Check Latest Price | |
|
Check Latest Price | |
|
Check Latest Price | |
|
Check Latest Price | |
|
Check Latest Price | |
|
Check Latest Price |
How Many Mixer Inputs Do You Actually Need?
Count speakers first, not microphones. Every person who speaks into the room needs their own channel so you can re-balance them in post and remove their noise independently. Guests who are only ever on a phone call do not need a channel at all; they come in through an aux or USB return.
Solo, recording alone: zero channels needed. A single interface with one XLR input is enough, and even that is optional if you record locally per participant.
Two people in the room: two XLR inputs. Anything with a third or fourth input is headroom for a guest, not a requirement.
Three or four people in the room: three or four XLR inputs, plus a matching headphone output per person so everyone can monitor without fighting over one jack.
Five or more in the room: you are past the podcast console and into a small digital mixer. Per-channel dynamics on every strip start to matter more than pads.
Remote-only show: no mixer. Each host records locally and the platform handles the mix. This is where people waste the most money.
One extra channel beyond your speaker count is a sensible target. It covers a guest who joins in person once, or a music bed returned over USB without stealing a mic channel.
1. Zoom PodTrak P4 – The Four-Input Recorder That Sets the Benchmark
Zoom PodTrak P4 Podcast Recorder with 4 XLR Mic Inputs, 4 Headphone Outputs, Phone & USB Input for Remote Interviews, Sound Pads, 2-In/2-Out USB Audio Interface, Battery Powered
4 XLR inputs
4 headphone outs
Mix-minus
Sound pads
SD multitrack
Pros
- Four XLR inputs and four independently controlled headphone outputs in one compact unit
- Automatic mix-minus for phone and USB call-in interviews
- Four programmable sound pads recorded to their own track
- Built-in preamps with enough gain for demanding dynamic mics
- Portable and simple to operate without a manual
Cons
- Onboard processing limited to basic EQ compression and noise reduction
- Records WAV at 16-bit/44.1 kHz only
- Small knobs and buttons for larger hands
- Light plastic build
The PodTrak P4 is a purpose-built interview recorder, not a repurposed music mixer. Four XLR inputs take phantom power for condensers, and each of the four headphone outputs has its own volume control, which is the detail that matters most in a room where two people are talking over each other and both need to hear themselves properly.
In our two-person setup it handled a pair of dynamic broadcast mics with no external gain booster, which is where cheaper four-input boxes start running out of headroom. The four sound pads record to their own tracks, so an intro sting or a sponsorship read lands on a separate file and stays editable.
The feature that quietly wins it the top spot is automatic mix-minus. For a phone or USB call-in interview, the caller hears themselves minus their own voice, so there is no echo. On podcast forums this is the reason it keeps coming up as the default answer for a four-mic setup that costs less than one premium dynamic microphone.
Two limits deserve a straight mention. It records WAV at 16-bit/44.1 kHz only, and its onboard processing is basic EQ, compression and noise reduction with nothing close to a broadcast processing chain. For a video or livestream workflow that wants 48 kHz, that file format is a real constraint rather than a preference.
When the PodTrak P4 is the right buy
Choose it for two, three or four people in a room, phone or USB call-ins, and any situation where you want the session captured to SD card as well as to the computer. The standalone recording means a crashed laptop does not cost you the episode.
It also suits a show that records away from a desk, since it runs on two AA batteries for up to 3.5 hours and weighs 130 g. Most owners simply power it from USB or a power bank instead.
When to skip it
Skip it if your video platform requires 48 kHz files, or if you want broadcast-grade voice processing applied at the desk rather than in post. Skip it if you have large hands and will be making live gain adjustments without looking, because the controls are genuinely small.
2. RODE RODECaster Pro II – The Full Studio in a Single Desktop Box
RØDE RØDECaster Pro II All-in-One Audio Production Studio
4 XLR inputs
APHEX processing
8 SMART pads
microSD and USB
Pros
- Four clean preamps with enough gain for demanding dynamics like the SM7B
- APHEX processing plus EQ compression gate and de-esser in one tap
- Eight programmable SMART pads for intros stingers and mix-minus
- Records standalone to microSD or USB and multitrack to computer
- Bluetooth and Wi-Fi expand call-in and remote options
Cons
- Considerable learning curve from the number of menus
- Some owners report USB port 1 refusing to connect to PCs and phones
- Bluetooth to phones can drop and need a reconnect
- Large desktop footprint and weight
The RODECaster Pro II is the most capable unit in this list and the least forgiving to learn. Four studio preamps with real gain mean a demanding dynamic microphone connects directly, no booster in the chain. The APHEX voice processing presets get a flat-sounding voice close to broadcast in a single tap, which is why so many shows that started here never went back to a manual chain.
Eight SMART pads go beyond triggering a clip. They can fire MIDI commands, change mix scenes, and handle mix-minus phone calls live. Recording works three ways: multitrack straight to your computer, standalone to microSD, or to a USB drive, and the unit runs fine with no computer attached at all.
What gave us pause was the volume of options. Owners consistently describe the touchscreen as fast and logical once learned, and just as consistently describe the first week as a learning curve. Multitrack sessions also do not sync into a DAW cleanly out of the box, so budget time for that step rather than expecting a plug-and-play import.
Two hardware issues show up often enough to mention. Some owners report USB port 1 refusing to connect to a PC or phone, and Bluetooth audio to a phone can drop after a period of use and need a daily reconnect. RODE’s support has been responsive, including a warranty replacement in at least one reported case.
Who should buy the RODECaster Pro II
It suits a show that is a production rather than a recording: streaming with music and sound effects, a video podcast, or a team that wants a broadcast voice chain without wiring outboard gear. Bluetooth and Wi-Fi make call-in guests and remote contributors considerably easier.
It is also the box to consider if you already own good microphones and want the desk to be the centre of the studio. Pair it with a broadcast dynamic and you will not need a Cloudlifter or inline preamp.
Who should pass
Pass if you record two people and nothing else. You will use a fraction of the feature set and pay for the rest. Pass if you need to carry the recorder between locations; at 2 kg this is a permanent desk fixture, not a field device.
3. Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 – One Person, One Mic, Done Properly
Audio-Technica AT-UMX3 USB Desktop Audio Mixer
1 XLR mic input
Loopback
24-bit/192 kHz
2 line inputs
Pros
- Compact desktop footprint with a clean simple layout
- Plug-and-play with no special drivers required
- Loopback mixes mic and instrument with computer audio for streaming
- 24-bit/192 kHz A/D converter
- Two line inputs cover guitar and keyboard
Cons
- Only one microphone input so it cannot record a conversation natively
- Stereo USB output only with no multitrack recording
- No onboard sound pads or voice processing
The AT-UMX3 is not a podcast mixer in the multi-guest sense. It is a small desktop box for a single host who wants a real XLR microphone, phantom power, and a clean USB connection without installing drivers. Weighing 12 ounces and measuring just over 5 inches square, it disappears on a desk.
Loopback is the part that earns its keep. It mixes the mic and instrument inputs with background music or computer audio and sends the combined stereo mix back to the computer, which is exactly what a solo streamer or a talk show with music beds needs. The 24-bit/192 kHz converter is unusually high resolution for a compact unit at this size.
Two line inputs sit alongside the single XLR or quarter-inch mic input, so a guitar or keyboard can be captured in the same pass. That makes it a reasonable hybrid for a creator who records voice and instrument in the same session.
The limitation is absolute rather than a matter of taste. One microphone input means no two-person conversation recorded natively, and the stereo USB path means no multitrack files. A two year warranty is included, which is worth noting at this level.
Where the AT-UMX3 fits
It is the right pick for a solo host streaming or recording at a desk with one microphone, and for anyone moving from a USB microphone to a real XLR dynamic without buying a full console. Loopback and driver-free setup make it the least fiddly streaming box here.
If you also record a musical instrument, the two line inputs keep it in contention with larger interfaces. We covered the microphone side in our podcast microphone guide.
Where it does not fit
Skip it the moment a second person joins you in the room. There is no second channel, no second headphone output, and no way to record a conversation with independent tracks. That is a hardware limit, not a settings problem.
4. MAONO AME2 – The Feature-Heavy Two-Person Console
MAONO AME2 Audio Interface Mixer, Podcast Studio Console with XLR Input
2 XLR inputs
60dB gain
11 sound pads
Dual headphone outs
Pros
- Rich feature set for the money with 11 pads reverb auto-tune and pitch shifting
- 60dB of gain with 48V phantom power covers dynamic and condenser microphones
- Two XLR inputs plus an instrument input make it a usable two-person setup
- Dual front headphone outputs let two people monitor independently
- Bluetooth accompaniment and a denoise function
Cons
- Some users report echo hum or buzz when chaining high-gain sources
- Onboard controls and screen are small and fiddly
- Loading custom pad sounds is poorly documented
- Buzzing from noisy wall power while charging
The AME2 packs more into its chassis than anything else at this level. Two XLR inputs with 48V phantom power and three-level gain reaching 60dB cover both condensers and demanding dynamics. Eleven customizable sound pads sit on top, three of which record up to 60 seconds with one-key looping and eight more supporting 20 seconds each.
Dual front headphone outputs mean a host and a guest can each monitor at their own level, which is the feature that usually forces people upward in price. A 6.35mm instrument input with high headroom also makes this a usable box for guitar and bass, and the included box covers a USB-C cable, two TRRS cables and a manual.
The voice effects go further than most people need: six reverb modes, a 12-step auto-tune, three tone controls and a pitch changer. For a livestream with background music, the Bluetooth accompaniment and AUX-IN are genuinely useful additions.
Now the honesty. Several users report echo, hum or buzz when several high-gain sources are combined, and a few report audible buzz from noisy wall power while the unit is plugged in. Driver updates were needed by at least one user to cut noise above half output. The controls and screen are small and take practice, and the process of loading custom sounds onto the pads is not well documented.
One structural caveat: USB microphones are not supported. Everything routes through XLR, 6.35mm or 3.5mm inputs, so an existing USB mic on your desk cannot be used with it.
Who should buy the AME2
It suits a two-host show on a budget who also want sound pads, voice effects and dual monitoring without buying two boxes. If you stream music and talk at the same time, the loopback, sidechain and music-only switches cover the usual routing problems.
It is also the most natural upgrade from a pair of USB microphones for anyone willing to move to wired XLR. Our bundle guide covers the alternative path if you want everything pre-wired.
Who should look elsewhere
Look elsewhere if you need three or four people in the room, or if your space has noisy mains power and you are sensitive to hum at high gain. Anyone who records long sessions and needs per-microphone tracks will find two channels limiting quickly.
5. MAONO G1 Neo – The Cheapest Real XLR Entry Point
MAONO G1 Neo Gaming Audio Mixer Audio Interface with XLR Input & 48V
XLR mic input
48V phantom
One-click noise reduction
Voice effects
Pros
- Very low cost for a mixer with an XLR input and 48V phantom power
- One-click noise reduction makes a condenser mic usable for streaming
- Voice-changing effects and four custom sound pads add character
- RGB lighting and a compact footprint suit a gaming desk
- Broad platform compatibility including PS4 and PS5
Cons
- Only one XLR microphone input so it is single-host oriented
- No multitrack recording or multibus output
- Small buttons with little status feedback beyond the RGB lighting
The G1 Neo exists because the cheapest way into XLR podcast audio should not be a bare interface. It has a real XLR input with a pro preamp, 48V phantom power and a gain range of -45dB to -55dB, so a condenser microphone works without a separate interface.
One-click noise reduction is the standout for streaming, where a desk fan or keyboard clatter usually gives away a cheap setup. Reverb, sidechain, one-click mute, loopback and direct monitor are all present, and four custom sound pads plus voice-changing effects add character to a stream without extra software.
It works with phones, computers, tablets and consoles, and with OBS, Discord, Twitch, TikTok, YouTube and Zoom. The 12-mode RGB lighting is a streaming feature rather than a podcast one, but it does make the unit easy to spot on a crowded desk.
What you give up is scale. One XLR input means one host, there is no multitrack recording and no multibus output, and the buttons are small with status feedback limited mostly to the lighting. It is not compatible with USB microphones, Xbox, or other MAONO devices, which is an oddly specific limitation worth knowing before you plan a desk around it.
For a longer streaming session, the included 5V power adapter is recommended over bus power.
Who the G1 Neo suits
A solo creator who wants a proper XLR microphone path, a gaming setup with a condenser mic, and someone who wants voice effects and pads in hardware. The low cost makes it a low-risk first mixer to learn gain staging on.
Pair it with a broadcast dynamic and the 55dB of gain is enough. It is one of the few boxes here where the preamp comfortably covers a demanding dynamic without an external booster.
Who should skip it
Skip it for any show with more than one person in the room, and skip it if you plan to add a second microphone later, since there is no way to expand it. It is a streamer and single-host box, not a podcast console.
6. Tascam Mixcast 4 – The Four-Person Panel Station
TASCAM Mixcast 4 Podcast Streaming Mixer, Recorder, and USB Audio Interface — Four XLR/TRS Mic Inputs, Touch Screen and Editing Software Included
4 XLR/TRS inputs
14-track SD recording
8 pad banks
Mix-minus aux
Pros
- Four mic inputs with four individual headphone outputs for a full panel
- Records 14 tracks straight to SD card without a computer
- Eight banks of customizable illuminated sound pads
- Mix-minus aux input handles phone call guests cleanly
- Bluetooth input plus USB for computer sound sources
Cons
- Touchscreen menus take practice to navigate during a live session
- Large and heavy desktop footprint for a compact mixer
- Requires separate microphones headphones and an SD card before first use
The Mixcast 4 is built around one job: four people talking in a room, captured properly, with no computer required. Four XLR/TRS mic inputs each have switchable phantom power, and there are four independent headphone outputs so no one shares a jack.
Recording 14 tracks directly to the SD card is the feature that separates it from a purely computer-based setup. That includes every input and every pad, which means a sting played mid-show lands on its own file rather than buried in a mix. Bluetooth input, an aux input with mix-minus for phone guests, and USB connectivity round out the sources.
Eight banks of customizable illuminated sound pads give far more trigger options than the four-pad units at the entry end, and Tascam Podcast Editor is included for post-production and track arming.
The reservations are practical. At 2550 g with a 14.76-inch width, it is a permanent desk fixture rather than a portable recorder. The touch panel works well but needs familiarisation before you can navigate it quickly while talking. And microphones, headphones and an SD card all have to be bought separately before the first session.
For a show that is mostly two people, that footprint and menu depth is more than the job needs.
Who the Mixcast 4 is for
A four-person roundtable, a panel show, or a team that records in a room and wants a full SD backup of every track. The per-person headphone outputs make shared monitoring painless, which is the daily reality of a four-seat setup.
It also suits a production that plays beds and stingers live, since eight pad banks beat a four-pad deck without needing a computer for triggers.
Who should choose something smaller
Choose the PodTrak P4 if two or three people are recording, or if you need the unit to travel. The Mixcast 4 is only worth its footprint when all four channels get used.
7. Tascam Model 12 – Twelve Inputs When the Show Grows Up
Tascam Model 12 All-in-One 12-track Digital Multitrack Mixing and Recording Studio, Mixer, USB Audio Interface and DAW Controller
12 inputs
Per-channel compressor and EQ
12 in/10 out USB
SD multitrack
Pros
- All-in-one 12-channel recorder mixer USB interface and DAW controller in one chassis
- Every input channel has a one-knob compressor and three-band EQ built in
- Dual headphone outputs with independent volume and source selection
- Multitrack recording to SD without a computer
- Solid broadcast-style build with click and tap tempo output
Cons
- Large and heavy at over 13 pounds so it is a permanent desk fixture
- Channel strip and menu operation takes time to learn
- More expensive and complex than a dedicated podcast mixer
The Model 12 stops being a podcast mixer and becomes a small production console. It combines a 12-track digital multitrack recorder, an analog mixer, a 12 in / 10 out USB audio interface and DAW control in one chassis, which means one box replaces three or four pieces of gear.
The per-channel processing is the reason to buy it. Every input module has a one-knob compressor and three-band EQ, so gain staging, compression and tone shaping happen at the desk on every channel including future ones. Dual headphone outputs each get independent volume and source selection, which is what a control room and a guest position both need.
Multitrack recording to SD works without a computer, and the click output with tap tempo plus onboard MIDI make it usable as a tracking surface for instruments as well as voices.
At 13.3 pounds and 18 by 16 inches, it is a desk fixture in the most literal sense. Owners also note that channel strip and menu operation takes time to learn for something as simple as a podcast, and that it is more expensive and more complex than a dedicated podcast mixer for a two-to-four person show.
We think that is the correct trade to make only once a fixed cast is recording every week and the next step would have been an outboard compressor anyway.
Where the Model 12 earns its size
A fixed five-plus person panel, a show that also tracks music or sound design, and anyone who wants to move between podcast and music production without changing hardware. The per-channel dynamics are the feature you will notice daily.
For a smaller desk setup, the podcast desks roundup covers surfaces sized for the compact options here.
Where it is overkill
Skip it for a one or two-person show. You will use a fraction of the channels and spend your time learning menus instead of recording. It is also the wrong first mixer for someone who has never set preamp gain before.
8. Behringer XENYX 802S – A Quiet Analog Desk Beside Your Computer
Behringer XENYX 802S Premium Analog 8-Input Mixer with USB Streaming Interface
8 analog channels
Stereo USB return
3-band EQ
Physical faders
Pros
- Very low self-noise with no hum or hiss at normal gain
- Genuine physical faders and knobs make level control precise and fast
- USB return with its own EQ mixes computer or game audio in
- Simultaneous monitoring of USB and regular inputs with separate main and monitor controls
- Reliable build that survives frequent transport and setup
Cons
- Stereo USB interface only so no multitrack recording of channels
- No XLR mic inputs or pads so an external interface is needed
- Internal USB DAC quality is modest
- Some units ship with a cheaper power supply
The XENYX 802S is an analog mixer with a USB return, and understanding that distinction saves a lot of confusion. It is eight channels of real mixing with 3-band EQ on every channel, XLR, TRS and RCA outputs, and physical faders and knobs rather than a touchscreen.
What owners like most is the low self-noise. At normal gain there is no hum or hiss, and the physical controls let you change a level without looking, which matters when a guest starts talking over you mid-sentence. The USB return has its own EQ, so computer or game audio can be blended in rather than dumped at a fixed level.
It is also just a dependable analog mixer for rehearsal, small PA work or a podcast room, and reviewers report the build survives frequent transport.
The catch is equally clear. There are no XLR mic inputs, so a condenser podcast microphone needs a separate interface. The USB path is stereo, so there is no multitrack recording of individual channels, and the internal DAC is entry-level compared with a dedicated external one. Some units also ship with a cheaper power supply than the previous generation.
Treat it as a mixer that can borrow computer audio, not as a recording device.
Who should buy it
A creator who already has an audio interface and wants a physical control surface to bring computer playback into the mix, or someone who wants a quiet analog mixer for non-podcast duties at the same desk. The self-noise floor is the selling point.
It pairs naturally with a separate two-channel interface for a two-person show where the mics are handled elsewhere.
Who should skip it
Skip it if you want one box to handle microphones and recording. Buying this as a first podcast mixer means buying a second box immediately, which defeats the purpose. It is the wrong answer to a query about podcast mixers even though it appears beside several that are right.
9. FIFINE SC1 – Moving One Host From USB to XLR
FIFINE PC Audio Mixer for Recording Music, USB Interface for Streaming and Podcasting with XLR, Monitor, 48V Phantom Power, Gain Knob, for Instrument Guitar/Video Content Creation/Vocal-Ampli 1
1 XLR mic input
48V phantom
Instrument input
Direct monitor
Pros
- Compact inexpensive way to move a USB mic setup to XLR
- 48V phantom power and a mic gain knob let condenser mics work
- Direct monitor knob gives real-time headphone monitoring
- Separate instrument input and output volume control for music recording
- Plug-and-play on both Mac and PC
Cons
- Only one microphone input so it handles a single host at a time
- Stereo USB output with no multitrack recording
- No sound pads headphone split or onboard voice processing
The FIFINE SC1 is the shortest path from a USB microphone to a real XLR setup. One XLR microphone interface with 48V phantom power and a dedicated gain knob, one instrument input, and a direct monitor knob for real-time headphone monitoring, all in a box weighing 500 g.
It runs up to 192 kHz over USB and is plug-and-play on both Mac and PC with no driver step. For a solo host who records spoken word and occasionally an instrument, the separate input and output volume controls are more than a bare interface offers.
It is a small, focused device with no screen and no menus, which is exactly why it works. There is nothing to configure and nothing to get wrong.
The limit is the same one shared by the other single-input boxes here. One microphone means one host, the stereo USB output means no multitrack, and there are no sound pads, no headphone split and no onboard voice processing. If a second person ever sits down with you, you are replacing it.
It is included with a USB-C cable and a manual, and works with any software that supports USB audio devices.
Who the SC1 works for
A solo creator upgrading from a USB microphone who wants phantom power and a real XLR connection at minimal cost, or a musician recording a vocal and an instrument in one pass. The direct monitor is the detail that makes it pleasant to record on.
At this size it also fits a small desk without rearranging anything.
Who should pass
Pass for any conversation. There is no second channel to record a guest on and no way to add one. Also pass if you want sound effects during a stream, since there are no pads and no loopback routing to speak of.
10. MAONO E2 Gen2 – Two Hosts With a Battery Inside
MAONO E2 Gen2 Podcast Equipment Bundle Audio Interface Mixer
2 XLR combo inputs
60dB gain
8 pads
8-hour battery
Pros
- Two XLR combo inputs with up to 60dB of gain suit a two-host show
- Built-in 1500mA battery gives around 8 hours away from mains
- Eight customizable sound effect pads plus pitch change and six reverbs
- Loopback and monitor buttons simplify streaming and gaming
- Bluetooth accompaniment and AUX inputs for phone music and call-ins
Cons
- 48 kHz maximum sample rate which is below most competing interfaces
- 10-channel control surface with small buttons can feel cluttered
- Does not provide power delivery or phone charging over USB-C
The E2 Gen2 is a two-person podcast bundle in a single unit, and the built-in 1500mA battery is what separates it. Around eight hours of use away from mains means you can record a full day of interviews in a different room without hunting for a cable.
Two XLR combo inputs with low-noise preamps delivering up to 60dB of gain cover both dynamic and condenser microphones for a two-host show. Eight customizable sound effect buttons support up to 20 seconds of audio each with adjustable volume, and there are six preset reverbs, pitch-changing effects and a SingAlong mode.
Loopback and a one-touch monitor button handle the streaming cases, while Bluetooth accompaniment and AUX-IN cover phone music and call-ins. It works on Windows and macOS with OBS, Discord, Zoom, Audacity, YouTube, Facebook, TikTok and Twitch.
The technical caveat worth naming is the 48 kHz maximum sample rate, which is below most competing interfaces and matches what video platforms want. The 10-channel control surface also packs many small buttons into a 9.64 by 6.18 inch panel, which can feel cluttered once you have more than two microphones to think about.
Finally, it is an audio device only. It does not charge a phone or deliver power over USB-C, so a phone guest needs their own power source during a long session.
Who should choose the E2 Gen2
A two-host show that records on location, an interview series filmed in different rooms, and any creator who wants pads and voice effects without carrying a power supply. The battery removes the single most common field-recording problem.
Its 48 kHz ceiling also makes it a safer video-podcast choice than several entry consoles, since it matches what those platforms expect.
Who should pass
Pass for three or four people in a room, where two channels is the binding constraint. Pass if you want to record higher-resolution audio, and pass if you rely on USB-C to keep a phone alive during a long interview.
11. Elgato Wave XLR MK.2 – The Streaming Interface With the Most Gain
Elgato Wave XLR MK.2 USB Audio Interface and DSP Mixer
80dB XLR gain
Zero-latency monitoring
Onboard DSP
Wave Link
Pros
- 80dB of gain comfortably drives high-output dynamic mics such as the SM7B
- Genuinely low-latency monitoring for podcast and call work
- Onboard voice enhancer compressor and EQ plus custom VST support in one chain
- LED level ring and touch mute are quick to read mid-session
- Wave Link handles multiple mixes and replaces a separate virtual mixer
Cons
- Wave Link software reported to crash and drop audio on multiple platforms
- The MK.2 is not compatible with PS5 unlike the original Wave XLR
- LED ring colour is not adjustable and the bouncing light can distract
- Built-in AI noise cancellation picks up room and fan noise rather than removing it
The Wave XLR MK.2 has the most preamp gain of any single-input device in this roundup, at 80dB. That is enough headroom for a high-output dynamic microphone such as an SM7B with no booster in the chain, and it pairs with a headphone amp output rather than a bare line-level jack.
Monitoring is the second strength. It runs at 24-bit/48kHz with ultra-low latency, which is the right combination for podcast and call work where you need to hear yourself without a delay. Onboard you get a voice enhancer, compressor and EQ, and the Wave FX Processor merges DSP effects and VST plugins into a single chain.
The Wave Link app handles routing, effects, monitoring and multiple mixes, which removes the need for a separate virtual mixer, and it integrates with Stream Deck. A touch mute control with a customisable LED ring gives quick level and status feedback mid-session.
The recurring complaint is software, not hardware. Wave Link is reported to crash and drop audio on multiple platforms, which in a live recording is the worst possible failure mode. The MK.2 also drops PS5 compatibility that the original Wave XLR had, the LED ring colour is not adjustable, and the built-in AI noise reduction tends to pick up room and fan noise rather than remove it.
Test the software on your machine before you commit to it. It is the most capable single-host interface here and also the one most dependent on its companion app behaving.
Where the Wave XLR MK.2 wins
A solo streamer or podcaster who wants the maximum gain available in a compact unit, already works inside an Elgato or Stream Deck setup, and records at 48 kHz. The multiple-mix routing in Wave Link is a genuine advantage for a live show with music and a remote guest.
Its 11.36-ounce weight and small footprint keep it out of the way on a desk.
Where it does not
Only one XLR input means no second guest in the room. And if you cannot run Wave Link reliably on your system, the low-latency advantage is lost, because the routing depends on it.
12. Facmogu F998 – The Smallest Thing That Still Works
Facmogu F998 Live Sound Card Audio Mixer, Streaming Podcast Audio Interface
Single mic input
16 sound effects
1200 mAh battery
Bluetooth
Pros
- Very inexpensive entry point into podcast and streaming audio
- Seven independent knobs for bass mid treble backing track and monitoring
- Sixteen built-in sound effects and voice-changer styles
- Built-in 1200mAh battery makes it genuinely portable
- Bluetooth accompaniment and plug-and-play setup on iOS Android Mac and Windows
Cons
- Only a single quarter-inch or 3.5mm mic input so no XLR or multi-guest recording
- Low maximum output level with a condenser mic
- No multitrack recording and limited software filter control
- Some audible noise when headphones are plugged into the monitor output
The F998 is the cheapest way to add a mixing front end to a phone or laptop, and for a first attempt at podcasting that is a legitimate use. Seven independent volume knobs plus two faders cover bass, mid, treble, backing track and monitoring, and sixteen built-in sound effects with voice-changer options are unusually generous at this level.
A digital DSP chip handles noise reduction without added delay, an independent Bluetooth switch handles wireless accompaniment, and the built-in 1200 mAh battery makes it one of the few genuinely portable options in this roundup. It supports up to two people and three devices broadcasting at once, and works on iOS, Android, iPad, Mac OS and Windows.
For TikTok-style live streaming or karaoke it does more than enough, and the size means it disappears in a bag.
The mic input is a single quarter-inch or 3.5mm jack, so there is no XLR, no phantom power and no multi-guest recording. Owners also report a low maximum output level that leaves some unable to get a condenser microphone to a satisfying volume, audible noise at the headphone monitor output, and no multitrack recording.
Bluetooth pairs with only one device at a time, and the limited filter control will feel thin if you are already running complex streaming software chains.
Who the F998 suits
Someone recording a short-form video podcast on a phone, testing whether they enjoy the format before spending on microphones, or a creator who wants a portable Bluetooth mixer for live streams. The battery and the size are the reasons to buy it.
Sixteen effects and a voice changer make it a reasonable live-stream companion even for people who record podcasts elsewhere.
Who should skip it
Skip it for a recorded podcast. No XLR, no multitrack, and low output headroom mean a condenser microphone will be quiet and noisy. Anything you plan to publish and edit later deserves a proper preamp and separate tracks.
How to Choose a Podcast Mixer: Six Criteria That Matter
1. Input count, decided by headcount. Every speaker in the room needs a channel. Match headphone outputs to mic inputs so each person monitors independently. One spare channel beyond your cast is a sensible target.
2. Preamp gain, checked against your microphone. Condensers and most broadcast dynamics are easy. A low-output dynamic such as an SM7B needs 55 to 60dB of gain or a Cloudlifter. The MAONO units reach 60dB and the Elgato reaches 80dB; check the figure before you commit to a demanding mic.
3. Does it also record? This is the distinction most roundups blur. A mixer that records to SD card or USB writes a local backup you control. A mixer that only mixes hands a single stereo stream to your computer, and a software crash takes the session with it. If you care about recoverability, treat SD recording as a requirement rather than a bonus.
4. Mix-minus, if anyone joins by phone. Mix-minus is a second mix bus that sends the caller everything except their own voice. Without it, remote guests hear an echo and most callers stop talking normally. The PodTrak P4 does it automatically, the Mixcast 4 has a dedicated aux input for it, and the RODECaster Pro II can trigger it from a SMART pad.
5. Sample rate, and the 44.1 kHz question. Record at 48 kHz for anything involving video or livestreaming, because that is what those platforms expect. The Zoom PodTrak P4 records WAV at 16-bit/44.1 kHz only, and that is the most-cited technical objection to it in podcasting forums. For an audio-only show it is fine; for a video show it decides the purchase. The MAONO E2 Gen2 caps at 48 kHz, and the FIFINE SC1 and Elgato Wave XLR MK.2 both reach 192 kHz.
6. Headphone monitoring quality. Monitoring has to be low-latency enough that speakers do not talk over their own playback. The Elgato’s zero-latency claim is the strongest here, but its routing depends on software that some owners report crashing. Count on independent per-channel headphone outputs more than on any specific latency figure.
One more honest note: USB microphones are not supported by several of these units, including the MAONO AME2 and G1 Neo. If your current setup is USB, you are moving to a new cable and a new mic stand regardless of which mixer you choose.
What You Do Not Need to Buy
If you record a remote show alone, you do not need any of the mixers above. Recording each participant locally and letting the platform handle the mix produces a better result than routing everything through a hardware box, and it is the configuration most professional remote shows use.
You also probably do not need the channel count you think you need. A two-person show buying a four-input console will leave two channels unused for the life of the product. If the third or fourth channel is purely speculative, spend the difference on better microphones instead.
Before buying a second box, check whether the one you are considering already records. A mixer that only mixes still needs an interface and a recorder behind it, and that is the hidden cost behind several cheap analog options in this roundup. A Cloudlifter is only necessary if you are running a low-output dynamic on a mixer with limited gain, not by default.
Our podcast equipment bundles guide covers the other end of the problem, where buying everything pre-wired is the sensible route.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best audio mixer for podcasts?
The Zoom PodTrak P4 is the best overall choice for most shows. It has four XLR inputs, four independent headphone outputs, four sound pads, automatic mix-minus for phone and USB call-ins, and standalone multitrack recording to SD card. For a two-person show on a tighter budget, the MAONO AME2 covers the same ground with two XLR inputs and dual headphone monitoring.
Do I need a mixer or an audio interface for podcasting?
If you record two or more people into the same computer, you need one of the two, and many podcast mixers are both at once. If you record a single person, an audio interface with one XLR input is enough. If your show is remote-only, you need neither, because each participant records locally and the platform mixes.
How many inputs do I need for a 4 person podcast?
Four XLR inputs and four headphone outputs. Every speaker in the room needs their own channel so you can re-balance levels and remove noise per person in post. A fifth channel is worth having if a guest joins in person regularly or you want to return a music bed over USB without taking a mic channel.
What are the key differences between the Zoom PodTrak P4 and a four-input console?
The PodTrak P4 is built for interviews: mix-minus for call-in guests is automatic, the four sound pads each record to their own track, and the whole unit weighs 130 g. Larger four-input consoles offer more onboard processing, more pads and bigger screens. The P4 records WAV at 16-bit/44.1 kHz only, which matters if you publish video.
Is USB or XLR better for podcast recording?
XLR is better for podcasts. It is a balanced connection, it carries phantom power for condenser microphones, and it gives each person an independent channel you can edit separately. USB microphones are convenient for a single solo host but cannot be split per person, and several podcast mixers in this roundup do not accept USB microphones at all.
Which Podcast Mixer Should You Buy?
The best mixers for podcast recording come down to headcount and whether you want local recording. For anything from two to four people in a room, with call-in guests and a local SD backup, the Zoom PodTrak P4 remains the pick we keep coming back to in 2026.
Record two people and nothing else, and the MAONO AME2 gives you dual XLR inputs, dual headphone monitoring and eleven sound pads for a fraction of the outlay. Recording solo at a desk means an audio interface, not a mixer, and our full podcast mixer roundup covers the wider field if you want to go deeper on the premium tier.